eb3_nepa
06-14 02:38 PM
What happens after the I-485?
I guess I-486:D
Funny. :)
But lets be serious about this guys. Maybe we can be proactive about some stuff here. Most of us got caught unawares with retrogression. I am sure we dont want to make the same mistake this time around.
I guess I-486:D
Funny. :)
But lets be serious about this guys. Maybe we can be proactive about some stuff here. Most of us got caught unawares with retrogression. I am sure we dont want to make the same mistake this time around.
wallpaper 2010 pin up girl hair styles
hibworker
02-13 01:47 PM
My husband recently changed jobs and has not updated the transfer in his H1 visa yet. I need to travel to India. Can i travel with the existing H4 with his new I-797 and salary stubs? Or do we have to updated the visas before we can travel?
Thanks.
Yes you can travel with latest approval notice and pay stubs although they most likely won't even ask for it. You do not need new visa before travelling back to US.
Thanks.
Yes you can travel with latest approval notice and pay stubs although they most likely won't even ask for it. You do not need new visa before travelling back to US.
aioros
05-16 08:30 AM
cool! like the gradients much ;)
2011 Pin-Up Girl Hairstyles #3-
fromnaija
06-23 12:46 PM
In addition there are applications that are labelled 'EXPEDITES' on receipts. These are applications where the applicant or one of the dependents is between 20 and 21 years old.
more...
sdrblr
11-30 03:45 PM
You can try but they recommend going to your own country for stamping if there is a change in status (H1 to F1 or vice versa). If you to Mexico, please have a plan B.
jliechty
June 18th, 2005, 04:14 AM
In general, macro lenses around 100mm are good for most kinds of macro photography. They have too much working distance for use on a copy stand, and not quite enough for skittish and/or dangerous insects or small animals. For general purpose stuff, the angle of view is such that you get enough background isolation to be worthwhile (you can rotate around your subject just a bit to get a highlight out of the background, while a 50mm macro takes in more background and makes this difficult).
I got a used Tamron 90mm, and let's just say that the build quality does not inspire confidence - however, the image quality is excellent. From what little I've seen of the Sigma 105mm macro (and from the many images that the members here have posted), it appears to have a bit better build quality and fine image quality as well. The Nikon macro is not going to be much better, if at all, in image quality than these, and you will pay dearly for the brand name. The one macro lens to avoid, however, is a "Phoenix" macro that only goes to 1:2 (that means that you can't get enough magnification for most small insects and flowers to fill the frame) and is most likely more cheaply built than my Tamron. Almost every other macro lens goes to 1:1 these days, and you can get the nicer ones used from KEH for not much more, so there's no reason to buy not-so-ideal lenses that you'll outgrow in no time anyway.
I got a used Tamron 90mm, and let's just say that the build quality does not inspire confidence - however, the image quality is excellent. From what little I've seen of the Sigma 105mm macro (and from the many images that the members here have posted), it appears to have a bit better build quality and fine image quality as well. The Nikon macro is not going to be much better, if at all, in image quality than these, and you will pay dearly for the brand name. The one macro lens to avoid, however, is a "Phoenix" macro that only goes to 1:2 (that means that you can't get enough magnification for most small insects and flowers to fill the frame) and is most likely more cheaply built than my Tamron. Almost every other macro lens goes to 1:1 these days, and you can get the nicer ones used from KEH for not much more, so there's no reason to buy not-so-ideal lenses that you'll outgrow in no time anyway.